To Trust - or - To Be Trusted?
TRUST? You folks mean the RECOGNITION of trust (from others who trust you) In the model of TQM I am familar with, there is a foundation of Ethics and Trust well before recognition is communicated. After the following article, how can anything more than a tarnished halo of trust remain on eBay?
JAY AND MARIE SENESE Ebay Power Seller Accused of THEFT and FRAUD with supporting documentation.
Is it the fault of their automation and "jayandmarie" programs (the scheduler and the relister) or was it premeditated Theft?
It does not matter to the customer and the people he/she talks to. In this context, the smaller seller has the advantage of control. Power Sellers using drop shipments and who are outsourced to the gills are not really sellers. They are brokers. And brokers (like eBay itself, though it prefers the term "markletplace") do not care about what they sell. They abrogate control because that would take time away from their brokerage.
Unlike a Wallmart, there is not even a human face to look over the merchandise before some minimum wage lackey junks it into an envelope.
Is JayandMarie.com the next to Enron from eBay? The article suggests as much as $250,000 may have been stolen over the years from eBayers. Theft is what happens when the advertised product, paid for, does not arrive.
And, as I have stated, brokers are not interested in touching product. They move it.
Trust? How can there be trust when the buyer never meets the seller?
Just a thought for you to mull over.
- Richard
Fraud Under $100.00: JayandMarie.Com formerly OneCentCDs
Quote:
Originally Posted by roban
Richard,
The link to the article returns a page not found. If you can find it again I'd like to read it.
A search on Google provides a report from RipOffReport.com. I work in PR so I know many of these grass roots sites - usually because I counter falsehood about my clients. These sites are popular because the posters have little to gain except to vent, and tarnish the reputation of the offending merchant; which they can do if they are clearly justified (countering "spin from PR counselors), cold, determined and patient. (Trust issues also revolve around these grass roots sites: e.g. is it a store war one is reading or a bonafide complaint? The key, as your post's anecdote concerning the refund exemplifies, is total disclosure. Enron is a classic example of what NOT to do - with NOT in neon. Tylenol is the archtypical model to follow.)
A search on www.RipOffReport.com yields not one article but two. ** Sorry I did not close the tag properly. I have fixed it now and tested it.**
"Loyalty progams" do not work without trust. As I imagine 1CentCDs will find out one day. As information concerning their practices spiders across the web, there will be a snowball effect in a lack of trust. No one likes to be cheated, but especially not those without the pockets to afford it (who tend to be e-bargain shopers). JayandMarie.com's return customer program is based on an unsophisticated shipping price break for multiple items sold at one time rather than on the principles of relationship marketing over a period of time.
Unfortunately for them, their profits are derived from shipping so they are limited by their choice to fight on price rather than the communication of integrity.
- Richard.